The court allowed the application for condonation of delay of 104 days filed by the appellant for raising personal and logistical reasons. The appeal is posted for orders.
Condonation of delay of 104 days allowed; appeal posted for orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M A No. 477/2016(CoD) In Appeal No. 165/2016
Between
Shri Santosh M. Sharma … Appellant/s
The Maharashtra State Co-op Ltd & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr Rajesh Nagori, i/b Ms Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 28/10/2022:-
The application for condonation of delay is filed for condoning the delay of 104 days. The reason stated in the application is that the Appellant is from outside the State and hence, contacting the lawyer in Mumbai caused the delay. There are no malafides in delaying the filing of the Appeal. Hence, the application for condonation of delay is allowed.
The Appeal is already taken on file.
Heard the Appeal.
Post on 01.11.2022 for orders.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 104 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Santosh M. Sharma
The Maharashtra State Co-op Ltd
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
