The appellate tribunal dismissed an appeal for default due to the withdrawal of Vakalatnama and non-appearance of the appellant.
Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 163/2016
Between
M/s. Asset Reconstruction Co.(India) Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Mehta Plastochem Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 13/10/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant had withdrawn her Vakalatnama and time was granted to file fresh Vakalatnama. There is no representation today for the Appellant.
I assume that the Appellant is not keen on proceeding with the matter.
Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-08
1
M/s. Asset Reconstruction Co.(India) Ltd.
Mehta Plastochem Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
