Union Bank of India and Ors. v. Sh Darshan Mohan Singh Nanda and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.162/2022 Arising out of Appeal No. 01/2022 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Union Bank of India Vs Sh.Darshan Mohan Singh Nanda & Ors.
14.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Hemraj Sidharth, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Parvinder Singh along with Mr. VPS Ahluwalia and Mr. O.P. Mathur, Ld. Counsels for respondents no.1 and 2.
Mr. Nikhil Jain, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.3 i.e. RIICO.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Notice. Mr. Parvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2 and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.3 accept notice and seek time to file reply.
Let reply be filed within four weeks by respondents and rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
Meanwhile, the RIICO is directed not to cancel the leasehold right of plot no. A-200 MIA, Alwar till the next date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
Sh. Darshan Mohan Singh Nanda
- respondent
RIICO
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court