The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal for default due to the absence of appellants despite adjournment granted for their representation. No arguments were presented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):159/2017
M/S. Cea E Shop & Ors V/S Indian Overseas Bank
11/11/2022
No representation for appellants. Ld. Counsel for respondent reported ready.
The matter is posted to 23.9.2022 under caption ‘for dismissal’, as appellants were absent on 23.8.2022. On 23.9.2022, at request of advocate for appellants, matter is adjourned to this date under the same caption of dismissal in order to give an opportunity to them to proceed with the case. In spite of that, appellants evinced no interest in prosecuting the appeal.
Therefore, Appeal RA(SA) 159/2017 is dismissed for default.
Sd/Chairperson
M/S. Cea E Shop & Ors
Indian Overseas Bank
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
