This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 128 of 2014)
(Arising out of M.A. 26 of 2010 in DRT, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
25.03.2022
D. Ranga Reddy … Appellant Vs.
Punjab National Bank & Others … Respondent Bank
None for Appellant
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
None for other Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the second round but no one is present for the Appellant.
I have gone through the judgment, dated 17th August, 2018, passed in W.P. 36100 of 2017 by the Hon’ble High Court at Hyderabad.
From the judgment it transpires that the Hon’ble Court has held that there is a delay of only four days in preferring the present appeal.
Having gone through the record of the case and upon hearing the Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank, I find that delay in filing the appeal has sufficiently been explained. Accordingly the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
Appeal be registered as regular appeal.
2
Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank seeks leave to file counter-affidavit.
Leave granted.
Counter affidavit be filed within three weeks; advance copy whereof be served upon the Appellant; rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date with advance copy to the Respondent Bank.
List the matter on 20th June, 2022 for hearing.
Sd/-
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 25th March, 2022 03/ac
D. Ranga Reddy
Punjab National Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court