The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the bank's appeal as infructuous because the underlying special appeal it was against was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 123 of 2014)
(Arising out of S.A. 56 of 2013 in DRT-1 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
15.09.2022
State Bank of India
… Appellant
-Vs-
B. M. Enterprise & Ors.
… Respondents Mr. Debasish Saha, learned counsel for the appellant. None.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant bank submits that this appeal was preferred against an interim order passed in S.A. 56 of 2013. The S.A. was dismissed for default on 25.07.2019, as such present appeal becomes infructuous.
In such circumstances the Appeal No. 123 of 2014 is dismissed as infructuous.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of this order be supplied to the parties and sent to the concerned
DRT.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 15th September, 2022 22/pkb
State Bank of India
B. M. Enterprise & Ors.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
