The appellate tribunal listed the appeal for arguments on a future date after noting a lack of supplied documents. The order grants liberty to approach for early hearing in case of urgency and provides for digital service of documents. It is an administrative order regarding procedure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.12/2020 Arising out of S.A.No.13/2016 (DRT, Jaipur)
Gruth Finance Ltd.(now Merged Into The Bandhan Bank Ltd.) Vs Geeta Devi Jangidh & Ors.
19.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Usha Singh, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Amol Vyas, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent no. 1.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. Counsel for the Respondent no. 1 states that he has not been supplied with copy of condonation of delay application. Let the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the respondent no. 1 via email today itself.
List the matter for arguments on 16.03.2023.
In case of urgency, both the parties are at liberty to approach this Tribunal for early hearing.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ak
Gruth Finance Ltd.
Geeta Devi Jangidh & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
ak
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
