canara bank (Syndicate Bank) v. M/s Rusni Disti
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No.11 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. 609 of 2017 in DRT-2, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 22.072022 | Canara Bank | … Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| -vs- | ||
| M/s. Rusni Dis |
tilleries Private |
|
| Limited & |
3 Others |
|
| … | Respondents |
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Syndicate Bank having been merged with Canara Bank, necessary amendment be carried out by Appellant in course of the day.
Despite service, Respondent No. 3 is not represented.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
M/s. Rusni Distilleries Private Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court