State Bank of India v. Ravi Venkaiah Naidu
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 460 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. 32 of 2018 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.09.2022 State Bank of India … Appellant -VsRavi Venkaiah Naidu … Respondent Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 and 2
Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury with Mr. Ratul Das Mr. Dilawar Khan nd Mr. Kamran Hussain, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that he will not file any rejoinder against the opposition filed by Respondents No. 1 and 2. Respondent No. 3 may file opposition, if any, within two weeks with advance copy to Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List on 13th January, 2023 for hearing of appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Ravi Venkaiah Naidu
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court