The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Radheshyam Meena against a DRT order in default, as no one appeared before the court for the hearing.
Appeal dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 100/2020 Arising out of S.A. No. 61/2020 (DRT, Jaipur)
Radheshyam Meena Vs Jumbo Finvest (India) Ltd.
11.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None has appeared for the appellant.
Appeal is dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Radheshyam Meena
Jumbo Finvest (India) Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
