Mr Paful D Mayekar v. Standard Chartered Bank & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Judge ordered notice to be issued to the Respondent Bank as the latter appeared without counsel and has given up its Vakalatnama. Matter posted for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Appellant directed to issue notice to Respondent Bank directly.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 10/2011
Between
MrPraful D Mayekar V/s.
Standard Chartered Bank &Ors.
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
MrYogesh K. Deshpande, Advocate for Appellants.
There is no appearance for the first Respondent Bank. The Counsel who is holding the Vakalatnama has already given up the Vakalatnama and no fresh lawyer has been appointed.
The Appellant is, therefore, directed to issue notice to the Respondent Bank directly and get ready for a hearing.
Post on 14.09.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr Praful D Mayekar
- respondent
Standard Chartered Bank & Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court