M Rajanarayanan v. City Union Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal from the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai. The matter was settled between the parties. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and pending applications were dismissed as infructous.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the appeal allowed; other applications dismissed as infructous.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 349/2021 (Delay) & IA 350/2021 (Waiver) In
A.IR:96/2021
Rajnarayanan
... Appellant
Vs
City Union Bank Ltd. ... Respondent
02/05/2022
Representing counsel for Ld. Counsel Shri R.K.M. Suresh for petitioner/appellant present. No representation for respondent bank.
Advocate for appellant represented that matter is settled between parties and sought permission to withdraw the appeal and made an endorsement to that effect in the appeal memo.
Considering the same, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
As appellant has withdrawn the main appeal, other applications viz., IA 349/2021 (waiver) and IA 350/2021 (stay) are dismissed as infructous.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajnarayanan
- respondent
City Union Bank Ltd.
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 331090000962021
- Bench
- S Ravi Kumar
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court