Radheshyam Agarwal and Anr. v. SBI
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata noted defects including non-compliance of pre-deposit, unsigned annexures, and fee deficit in an appeal hearing and posted the matter for removal of defects.
What did the court decide?
Appellant directed to remove defects within 15 days.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.167/2017 Date:07/04/2022
Radheshyam Agarwal & anr………...Appellant
Vs.
State Bank of India & anr……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Ms. Barkha Kumari.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Radheshyam Agarwal & anr. against the order dt. 23.02.2017 in SA-420/2012 passed by the Hon’ble Presiding Officer, DRT -2, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.205/- vide T.R. no.110682 dt. 11.07.2017 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Ms. Barkha Kumari.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation but accompanied with a petition for condonation of delay.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under section 18 SARRAIA 2002 has been properly filed absent pre-deposit and authenticated annexures with correct fees.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Radheshyam Agarwal & anr
- respondent
State Bank of India & anr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090001672017
- Topic
- Arbitration
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court