M/S Queens Crown v. Bank of Baroda and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court directed the appellant to serve notice on the auction purchaser via newspaper publication due to failed prior service. No substantive legal issue or determination of rights was addressed.
What did the court decide?
Direction to serve notice on respondent no. 2 via newspaper publication.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 682/2022 Date: 21.12.2022
M/s Queens Crown Vs. Bank of Baroda
Appeal Dy. No. 686/2022 M/s N R Real States India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Appeal Dy. No. 690/2022 Shantanu Shandilya Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Present: Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant, Shri G. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
As per office report dated 20.12.2022, the notice sent to the respondent no. 2-Auction Purchaser has returned back with endorsement “left”. Therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 2-Auction Purchaser through publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the locality, where the said respondent resides. The affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that he shall file reply by the next date.
List this case on 31.03.2023 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall continue.
Justice R. D. Khare
Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s Queens Crown
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
- petitioner
M/s N R Real States India Pvt. Ltd.
- petitioner
Shantanu Shandilya
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090006822022
- Topic
- Property and Title
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court