Punjab National Bank and Anr. v. Smt Sneh Lata Agarwal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
On application for adjournment by respondent counsel being out of station, the Division Bench set the reply to delay condonation for the next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 185/2021 Date: 24.11.2022
Punjab National Bank and Anr. Vs. Smt. Sneh Lata Agarwal and Ors.
Present: Shri Sagar Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Shri K. M. Asthana, counsel for the appellant, Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for all the respondents,
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Gupta is out of station, therefore, he is unable to attend this Tribunal today and he prays for adjournment.
The record shows that no reply has been filed to the delay condonation application. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 02.03.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab National Bank and Anr.
- respondent
Smt. Sneh Lata Agarwal and Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court