Punjab National Bank v. Rohini Prasad Pandey and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order directs the filing of replies by the respondent number 1 & 2 and respondent numbers 3 to 6 in an appeal case.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 208/2020 Date: 06.12.2022
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rohini Prasad Pandey & Ors.
Present: Shri Dhananjay Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Sudhanshu Mishra, counsel for the respondent no. 1 & 2, None for the respondent no. 4,
Reply of the respondent nos. 1 & 2 is on record, to which no rejoinder has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant till date. Let the same be filed by the next date, if so desired.
The office report dated 05.12.2022 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 to 6. Let the said respondents file the reply by the next date, if so desired.
List this case on 17.03.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
Rohini Prasad Pandey
- respondent
Rohini Prasad Pandey & Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090002082020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court