Appellate Tribunal disposed of a petition seeking adjournment due to counsel's unavailability. Court denied adjournment, quashed false statements made by respondent counsel, and listed for merits.
Refused adjournment; matter listed for hearing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No.513 of 2021
(Arising out of IA/1333/2020 in SA/274/2019 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
--------
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
08.07.2022
Punjab National Bank & Another
Appellants
Vs
Sri Avijit Mukherjee
Respondents
Mr. S. Pal Choudhuri along with Ms. Samapti Roy, counsel for the Appellant.
Mr. Jiban Krishna De, Counsel for the Respondents.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ::
Mr. Jiban Krishna De is present on behalf of Mr. S.S. Bhutoria, counsel
for the Respondent and prays for adjournment on the ground that Mr. S.S.
Bhutoria, Advocate for respondent has gone to Chennai for his medical treatment. On verification of records, it is found to be a false statement as there is no vokalatnama filed for the Respondent. At this stage, Mr. Jiban
Krishna De, Advocate submits that he will file vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent before the next date of listing. I am refraining myself for making
any comments on the issue. However, list the matter on 26/07/2022 with
specific direction that matter shall be heard on merit on next date fixed.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava J.) Chairperson
Bose
Punjab National Bank & Another
Sri Avijit Mukherjee
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
