Prasad v. Potluri and Anr. v Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, admitted an appeal filed by Prasad V Potluri against an order of DRT-2, Hyderabad. The Registrar noted procedural defects, including missing verification details and uncertified copies of the impugned order, and issued summons for service.
What did the court decide?
Defects noted; summons issued for service of summons; matter posted for affidavit.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY.No. /314/2021 Date: 06/06/2022
Prasad V Potluri & Anr.. ...………...Appellants
Vs.
Canara Bank & Ors...... .……….Respondents
Received an application under section 20 of the Recovery of Debts due to bank and financial institutions Act,1993 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Nemani Srinivas.
Scrutiny of the application observed the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Prasad V Potluri & Anr against the order passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Hyderabad, order dated 21-12-2020 in IA/1484/2020 arising out of OA/714/2018. Application fees of Rs.255/- vide T.R. no.115045 dt.07-04-2021 has been paid along with the application.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is well within the period of Limitation.
The following defects are noted from the Application:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prasad V Potluri & Anr.
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 191090003142021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court