Pawan Kumar Jaiswal v. U C O Bank and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 127/2022 Date: 02.05.2022
Pawan Kumar Jaiswal Vs. UCO Bank & Anr.
Present: Shri Utkarsh Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sudhanshu Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Jagjeet Singh, counsel for the respondent no. 1-Bank, Shri Mayank Srivastava, counsel for the respondent no. 2,
Learned counsels for the respondents seek time to file reply to the waiver. Let the same be filed by the next date.
The amount deposited by the appellant towards pre-deposit for maintaining the appeal be kept in the form of FDR in Nationalized Bank for a period of six months in auto renewal scheme.
List this case on 24.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pawan Kumar Jaiswal
- respondent
UCO Bank
- respondent
Respondent no. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090001272022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court