Dismissed
S Palaniappan v. Indian Overseas Bank
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance of office objections within the stipulated time under DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
A.IR:205/2022
¶3
S.Palaniappan V/S Indian Overseas Bank & Anr
¶4
23/09/2022
¶5
Representing counsel for Appellant present.
¶6
Office objections not complied despite considerable time and opportunities given.
¶7
Appeal declined. in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules (1994) as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
¶8
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
S.Palaniappan
- respondent
Indian Overseas Bank & Anr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090002052022
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court