Noufal Ap v. Catholic Syrian Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal, citing a settlement between the parties. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and subsequently dismissed the IA as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. IA dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 542/2019 In A.IR:149/2019
Noufal A.P & Ors ... Appellant
Vs The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd & Anr ... Respondents
26/05/2022
Representing counsel Shri S.T. Bharath Goowtham for Ld. Counsel Shri A. Umapathy for appellant and representing counsel Shri S. Nityavendan for Ld. Counsel Shri K. Rajasekaran for R1 and R2 are present.
Advocate for appellant represented that matter is settled between parties and sought permission to withdraw the appeal and made an endorsement to that effect in the appeal memo.
Considering the same, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
As appellant has withdrawn the main appeal, other application viz., IA 524/2019 (direction) is dismissed as infructous.
Sd./Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Noufal A.P & Ors
- respondent
The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd & Anr
Coram
Sd./Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 331090001492019
- Bench
- S Ravi Kumar
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court