Diary lodged for removal of defects. Appellant was absent despite opportunities. Pursuant to Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Rules, the registrar declined to register the diary as the appellant was presumed not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Diary No. 608/2022 is declined for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumba
Diary No. 608/2022
Shri. Nitin Namdev Jagdale
Appellants
V/s.
Shri. Adinath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. 8 Ors.
Respondents
The Today's Board i.e. 13.12.2022 at 11.30 Hrs. for matters listed before the Registrar for removal of defects/ compliance is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on Notice Board of DRAT, Mumbai.
No representation for the appellant when matter was called.
This Diary No. 608/2022 was lodged on 11/07/2022. Despite granting reasonable opportunities for removal of defects the appellant failed to remove the defects noticed by the office and remaining absent. Hence, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
In view of above & under the provision of sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 this Diary No. 608/2022is hereby declinedforregistration.
Registrar, DRAT Mumbai
Date: 13.12.2022
13pe 12
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri. Nitin Namdev Jagdale
Shri. Adinath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. 8 Ors.
Registrar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
