M/ S Nagpal Traders and Others v. Punjab National Bank and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Programmable listing order in an appeal under Section 20 of the RDB Act. Registration held pending OA decision; admitted for April 18, 2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 95of 2022
(M/s Nagpal Traders and Ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank.)
Date: 12.04.2022
Shri Anup Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ram Kaushik is present and provides pin code no, deposited deficient court fee of Rs. 50/- and Court fee of Rs. 5/- on Vakalatnama and also files typed copy of page number requited from the appellant.
As regard pre-deposit Ld. Counsel states that the appeal is filed against interim order passed in O.A. The O.A is yet to be decided. Hence, condition of pre-deposit is not applicable.
As regard multiple relief sought, Ld. Counsel states that the relief sought are incidental and consequential.
It appears that relief soughts are not consequential, as the O.A. is yet to be decided and restoration of possession and restraining the Bank from auction sale are also prayed in relief column of the Appeal.
As regard certified copy Ld. Counsel states the down loaded copy of the impugned order has been filed and he undertakes that he will file certified copy of the impugned order.
The instant Appeal has been filed under section 20 of the RDB Act, against the interim order dated 26.07.2021 passed in O.A. No. 192/2021. Application for Condonation of Delay (I.A. 46/2022) has also been filed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Nagpal Traders and Ors.
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090000952022
- Bench
- LD Registrar
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court