Ms South India Packaging v. Canara Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 133/2022
In A.IR:68/2022
South India Packing & Ors ... Appellants Vs Canara Bank & Ors ... Respondents
30/05/2022
Ld. Counsel Shri T. R. Sundaram for petitioner/appellant present.
Proof of service filed in IA 133/2022 (waiver).
R1, R2, R3, R5, R6, R9, R10, R11, R12 & R13 served. Notice sent to R4 returned with postal endorsement ‘door locked’. Notice sent to R7 returned with postal endorsement ‘no such person’. Notice sent to R8 returned with postal endorsement ‘insufficient address’. Notice sent to R14 & R15 returned with postal endorsement ‘unclaimed’.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner/appellant represented that appellant is giving up R15 today.
Advocate Shri Kesavan undertakes to file vakalath for R1. Advocate Shri J. Milton Arul Rajendran undertakes to file vakalath for R2 to R14.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
South India Packing & Ors
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 331090000682022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court