The tribunal observed that service on respondent nos. 3 and 4 via newspaper publication was defective as the vernacular newspaper used the English language. The applicant was directed to republish the notice in the vernacular language thereafter.
Directing the applicant to republish the matter in vernacular language in the vernacular newspaper.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY No./167/2020, Date. 06/09/2022
M/s. Bapuji Gramya Silpadyog Samiti &Ors..………Applicants
V/s.
Neelachal Gramya Bank &Ors………….Respondents
None appears for appellant and respondents both.
However on verification of affidavit of service submitted on date by the clerk to the counsel of the appellant, it is observed that service upon respondent no.3 & 4 is properly published in English newspaper whereas in vernacular newspaper it is published in English language.
Hence, appellant is directed to republish the matter in vernacular newspaper in vernacular language.
Post this matter on 21-09-2022 for filing affidavit of service for newspaper publication in vernacular language upon respondent no. 3 & 4.
Registrar
M/s. Bapuji Gramya Silpadyog Samiti &Ors.
Neelachal Gramya Bank &Ors
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
