Mrs. Sethulakshmi v. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal listed notice to the Registrar to occupy the violation of orders because of non-pliance with office prosecution of cases and attached fees, the appeal to be treated as barred. The appeal was finally dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed because of non-compliance with office objections, including deficit court fee.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:200/2022
Mrs.Sethulakshmi & Ors V/S Hinduja Leyland Finance
09/09/2022
None for Appellant.
Office objections not complied, which Includes deficit Court fee etc. despite considerable time given.
Appeal declined in terms of 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules (1994) as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/-
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Sethulakshmi & Ors.
- respondent
Hinduja Leyland Finance
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090002002022
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court