Mrs Neerja Tiwari v. Allahabad Bank and 11 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order directing notice to respondents and status quo regarding a property mentioned in an NCLT claim filed by the respondent bank.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 839/2022 Date: 21.10.2022
Mrs. Neerja Tiwari Vs. Allahabad Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Prashant Kumar, counsel for the appellant,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the respondent-Bank has filed the claim before the NCLT, in which the claim of the flat of the appellant is also mentioned. It is further contended that the moratorium period has already been declared by the NCLT, therefore, no proceedings could be initiated by the Bank under the SARFAESI Act and the proceedings are bad in law and the order for possession is also bad in law. It is further contended that some of the allottees of the flats have moved the petition before the Hon’ble High Court, which has granted the interim relief with regard to the possession. The said order has been produced before this court, which is taken on record.
In view of the above, the parties concerned are directed to maintain status quo qua the property in question, as it exists today, till the next date.
Issue notice to the respondents by two modes i.e. Registered Post with A.D. and Speed Post. Steps to be taken by the appellant within a week. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
List this case on 03.01.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Neerja Tiwari
- respondent
Allahabad Bank & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court