Mrs.G.Kavitha v. City Union Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
A creditor recovered through an appeal in the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. An application to condone a 95-day delay in re-presenting the appeal was allowed based on affidavit reasons. The case was posted for filing a counter.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 95 days in representing the Appeal is condoned. IA 96/2022 is allowed.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 96/2022
In
AIR (SA) 189/2021
G.Kavitha ... Appellant Vs City Union Bank Ltd ... Respondent
24/06/2022
Mr. A. Karthikeyan Advocate filed Vakalat for Respondent Bank.
This Application is filed by Petitioner/Appellant to condone delay of 95 days in representing the Appeal.
Heard Counsel for Petitioner/Appellant and perused records.
Considering the reasons stated in the Affidavit filed in support of Petition, delay of 95 days in re-presenting the Appeal is condoned. IA 96/2022 is allowed. IA 96/2022 (Delay in re-presentation) is allowed.
Post the case on 12.07.2022, for filing counter.
Sd/Chairperson
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone delay of 95 days in representing the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Kavitha
- respondent
City Union Bank Ltd
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 331090001892021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court