Mr Satish Kumar v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
On a scrutinization, the registrar of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata noted procedural defects in an application for condonation of delay and quashing of an imugned order under Section 20 of the RDBBA, 1993, and issued summons.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.27/2020; Dt.:4.04.2022
M. Satish Kumar & anr .………...Appellant
Vs.
Canara Bank & anr.……….Respondents
Received an application under section 20 of Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. N. Srinivas.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of M. Satish Kumar & anr. against the order dt.30.09.2019 in IA-2244/2019 (OA/717/2017) passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-I, Hyderabad. Application fees of Rs.255/- vide T.R. no.114319 dt. 10.01.2020 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. N. Srinivas.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation but a petition for condonation of delay has been filed.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application is maintainable despite being filed beyond the period of limitation after filing a petition for condonation of delay.
Whether the listed defects in the application (improper paging, unsigned annexures, missing documents) can be corrected.
Whether the application is within the jurisdiction of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Satish Kumar & anr.
- respondent
Canara Bank & anr.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090000272020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court