Mr.Baraneetharan kandaswamy v. Bank of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the remaining applications of the appellant who failed to make the mandatory pre-deposit as ordered and who could not produce a further extension order from the High Court.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was rejected and other applications were dismissed due to non-compliance with the conditional order regarding pre-deposit.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 770/2019, IA 771/2019, IA 772/2018 & IA 773/2019 In A.IR:732/2017
Mr.Baraneetharan Kandaswamy V/S Bank Of Maharashtra & Ors
06/07/2022
IA 774/2019 (waiver): Advocate for appellant sought further time for production of extension order from Hon’ble High Court of Madras and represented that steps are being taken to get extension order. As on today, there is no extension. Therefore, I am not inclined to grant any further time.
Appellant has not made pre-deposit in compliance of order dated 23.1.2020.
For the above reasons, appeal is rejected as per conditional order dated 23.1.2020.
Consequently, other applications viz., IA 770/2019 (delay in restoration), IA 771/2019 (restoration), IA 772/2019 (delay in representation) and IA 773/2019 (delay) are dismissed.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. Baraneetharan Kandaswamy
- respondent
Bank Of Maharashtra & Ors
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090007322017
- Topic
- Arbitration
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court