Dismissed
Mohammed Ayyadan v. Catholic Syrian Bank Limited
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994 due to non-compliance of office objections by the office within the reasonable time limit.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declined as office objections were not complied in reasonable time.
What the court decided
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
A.IR:341/2022
¶3
Mohammed Ayyadan V/S Csb Bank Ltd & Ors
¶4
08/12/2022
¶5
None for Appellant.
¶6
None of the office objections complied yet. Appeal declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
¶7
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mohammed Ayyadan
- respondent
Csb Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090003412022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court