The DRAT allowed substitution of the first respondent subject to curing objections. The matter was listed for hearing on 15.11.2022.
Direction to the appellant to cure objections to the substitution of the first respondent expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 809/2019 (Restoration)
In
(Appeal No. 280/2016- Disposed of)
Between
Mr Cristopher Pereira … Appellant/s V/s. M/s. Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Sachin Kaikini, Advocate for Appellant. Ms Sneha Sudesh Nandgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 27/09/2022:-
The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that the application has been filed for substituting the first Respondent.
The office has raised certain objections which need to be cured.
The objections shall be cured expeditiously.
Post on 15.11.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-16
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether objections raised against substituting the first respondent need to be cured before hearing.
Mr Cristopher Pereira
M/s. Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
