The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed an application for restoration of an appeal dismissed for default, accepting the appellant's explanation of counsel absence and ordering a later review.
Application for restoration allowed; Appeal No. 82/2009 restored for reply and hearing on or after 19.10.2022
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 791/2017 (Restoration) In (Appeal No. 82/2009 – disposed of)
Between
Vinod Bhatia … Appellant/s V/s.
State Bank of India & Ors … Respondent/s
Mr. Rishab Shah, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Divya Jaiswar, i/b M/s. R. J. Singh & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 11/08/2022:-
1
bank requesting for an adjournment. An adjournment was granted and it was directed that a reply shall be filed within 3 weeks, positively, with an advance copy to be handed over to the Counsel for the appellant, but no reply has been filed till today.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-7
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of the appeal dismissed for default should be accepted.
Vinod Bhatia
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
