In this brief order, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeal as it pertained to a third party, noting that no question regarding predeposit arose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M A No. 478/2016(WoD) In Appeal No. 165/2016
Between
Shri Santosh M. Sharma … Appellant/s
The Maharashtra State Co-op Ltd & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Rajesh Nagori, i/b Ms Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 28/10/2022:-
The Appellant being a third party, the question of depositing as predeposit does not arise.
Hence, M.A. No. 478/2016 is disposed of.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-10
Santosh M. Sharma
The Maharashtra State Co-op Ltd & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
