Disposed
Hdfc Bank Limited v. Jindal Agro International and Ors.
DRATMISC APPLICATION/474/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Direction for hearing on adjournment sought due to counsel's covid illness.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
M.C. No.478/2019 Arising out of O.A.No.352/2018(DRT-III, Delhi)
HDFC Bank Ltd. Vs Jindal Agro International & Ors.
30.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice BrijeshSethi
Present: Proxy Ms. Deboshree Saha for Mr. Atul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Pratiti Rungta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondents.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Proxy counsel for appellant requests for an adjournment on the ground that the main counsel is suffering from Covid.
List the matter for hearing on 04.11.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ak/pk
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Jindal Agro International & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court