In a listing order, the tribunal adjourned the appeal to a later date as a High Court writ petition sought a stay on the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Application No.33/2021
In
Appeal No.280/2019
Arising out of O.A.No.280/1999(DRT-I, Delhi)
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.
Vs
M/s Nishiland Park Ltd. & Ors.
21.03.2022 Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, counsel for applicants/respondents
Ms. Manisha Aggarwal, counsel for respondent/appellant
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing today.
Learned counsel Ms. Manisha Aggarwal says that a writ petition (No.14190/2021) was filed by the appellant EARCIL before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court against the order dated 01.10.2021 of this Tribunal and the Hon’ble High Court vide its order dated 13.12.2021 has stayed that order of this Tribunal.
Let the matter come up on 06.07.2022 for hearing of the appeal.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.
M/s Nishiland Park Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
