Ms Meenu Bansal v. Allahabad Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Chairperson issued notice to the respondents via video conferencing on the application alleging no appearance by them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Application No. 27/2022
IN
Appeal No. 167/2018
Arising out of S.A. No. 671/2011 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Meenu Bansal
Vs
Allahabad Bank & Ors.
24.08.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Santosh Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the appellant. None for the respondents
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Affidavit of service has not been filed. No one has appeared on behalf of
the respondents. Let fresh notice be issued to respondents by all permissible modes for 17.10.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ap/pk
Meenu Bansal
Allahabad Bank & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court