The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal initially dismissed an appeal absent the appellant. Upon counsel's appearance citing a technical glitch, the Chairperson restored the matter and listed it for the subsequent date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Application No. 27/2021 Arising out of Appeal No. 03/2017 (DRT-III, Chandigarh)
Rajan Girdhar Vs Baljit Singh & Ors.
27.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None present on behalf of the appellant. Accordingly, the present appeal is hereby dismissed.
File be consigned to record room
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Application No. 27/2021 Arising out of Appeal No. 03/2017 (DRT-III, Chandigarh)
Rajan Girdhar Vs Baljit Singh & Ors.
27.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Pavan Malik, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
In the morning session none has appeared on behalf of appellant, therefore, matter was dismissed and file was consigned to record room.
Later on at the time of exhausting the board at about 3:00 p.m. Mr. Pavan Malik, Ld. Counsel for appellant appears and submits that due to technical glitch, he could not join video conferencing when his matter called serially; therefore, requests that matter may be restored back.
In view of the submissions made by the Ld. Counsel for appellant, the present application is restored back to its original position.
List this matter for 28.09.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Rajan Girdhar
Baljit Singh
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
