Application for transfer of matter to another Debit Recovery Tribunal was dismissed as infructuous because the designated DRT-II, Delhi was functional.
Application dismissed as infructuous because DRT-II, Delhi was functional.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Application No.126/2021 Arising out of 66/2020(DRT-II, Delhi)
Manoj Doomra & Another
Vs
UCO Bank
30.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice BrijeshSethi
Present: Mr. Anand Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Mr. C.M.L. Das, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
This is an application for transfer of matter from DRT-II, Delhi to some other DRT. Since the DRT-II, Delhi is functional now, the present application has become infructuous and it is dismissed as such.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ak
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for transfer of DRT matter is maintainable when the designated court is functional?
Manoj Doomra
UCO Bank
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
