Appellant sought to withdraw an application made to the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The Chairperson allowed the withdrawal by dismissing the application as infructuous.
Application dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Application No. 124/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 174/2019 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Mrs. Mamta Goyal Vs Punjab National Bank & Anr.
29.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Mrinal Kishore Jha proxy for Ms. Nishi Choudhary, Ld. Counsel for respondent bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. Counsel for appellant wants to withdraw the present application as it has become infructuous.
The application is therefore dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
File be consigned to record.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Mrs. Mamta Goyal
Punjab National Bank
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
