This order is an interim scheduling direction granting the respondent three weeks to file a Vakaltnama and reply before the next hearing post on 23.01.2023. It does not adjudicate the merits of the appeal or provide a final disposition on the substantive issues raised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 110/2020 (Restoration)
In (Appeal No. 184/2016- Disposed of)
Between
State Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s.
Nimish Mahendra Modi & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr. Amala Tikekar, i/b M/s. Untangle & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Sonali Jain, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 09/11/2022:-
The learned counsel for the Respondent seeks to file a fresh Vakaltnama for the fourth Respondent and seeks time to file a reply as well.
Reply and Vakaltnama shall be filed within three weeks.
Post on 23.01.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-05
1
State Bank of India
Nimish Mahendra Modi
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
