The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of two miscellaneous appeal challenging interlocutory orders of DRT-III, Mumbai, noting the pendency appeals had been disposed of by the lower court.
Prayer to withdraw the appeals allowed; both appeals disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 86/2014
Between Miss. Esha Keyur Shah & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s
And Misc. Appeal No. 87/2014
Between
Miss. Esha Keyur Shah & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Rohit Gupta, a/w Mr. Akbar Rizvi, i/b M/s. AKS Legal Consultants., Advocate for Appellants.
-: Order dated : 15/06/2022 :-
Misc. Appeal No. 86/2014 and Misc. Appeal No. 87/2014 are
two Appeals filed by the common Appellants challenging order of the DRT-III, Mumbai from two different interlocutory orders pending an Appeal No. 07/2014. During the pendency of these Appeals, Appeal itself has been disposed of by the Ld. Presiding Officer of DRT-III, Mumbai on 05.09.2014.
In view of disposal of the Appeal itself, the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants herein would like to withdraw the Appeals and hence the prayer is allowed.
Both Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Chairperson
mks-15 & 16
1
Miss. Esha Keyur Shah & Anr.
Bank of India & Ors.
Mr. Justice Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
