The appellate court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Counsel for the appellant requested withdrawal, noting the underlying special appeal had been disposed of by the DRT in a separate listing.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.84/2021 Arising out of S.A.No.106/2017 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Stressed Assets Stablilisation Fund & Others Vs Pasupati Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. & Ors.
20.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Deepak Kochhar, Ld. Counsel or appellants
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he wants to withdraw this appeal as the S.A. out of which the present appeal has arisen has been disposed of by the learned DRT. He further submits that that the appellant has filed a regular appeal against the final order passed by the learned DRT in the S.A., which has been listed today as item no.3.
In view of the above submissions, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Stressed Assets Stabilisation Fund & Others
Pasupati Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
