In Misc. Appeal No.84/2019, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal in default due to the appellant's non-prosecution and failure to appear in person or via video conference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.84/2019 Arising out of S.A.No.52/2017(DRT, Jaipur)
R.S.Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs
Toyota Financial Services India Ltd. & Anr.
19.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Sumit Goswami, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None has appeared on behalf of the appellant despite repeated calls. None had appeared on behalf of the appellant on the last date of hearing also. Pre-deposit application is pending disposal.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ak
R.S. Motors Pvt. Ltd.
Toyota Financial Services India Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
