This is a procedural order from the DRAT Delhi. The Chairperson adjourned the matter to allow the appellant to take steps regarding the missing details of legal heirs for an expired respondent. List fixed for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 82/2018 Arising out of O.A. No. 162/2017 (DRT-III, Chandigarh)
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. Vs M/s Swastika Knitting & Ors.
27.04.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Proxy Ms. Chandni Sadana for Ms. Usha Singh, Ld. counsel for the appellant.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for respondents 6 & 7 was directed to file details legal heirs of respondent no.7, who has unfortunately expired. However, the same has not been filed. Let the same be filed within one week. Let the appellant take necessary steps thereafter.
List for 12.10.2022 for further proceedings.
(CHAIRPERSON)
Later on, Mr. Ashok Kumar, Ld. counsel for respondents no. 6 & 7, has appeared and he has been apprised of the order above order.
(CHAIRPERSON)
pk/ap
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.
M/s Swastika Knitting
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
