The appellant failed to appear or file any representation. The appeal was dismissed for default as sufficient time was granted to the respondent which was not utilized.
The appeal was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 80/2019
Between Sanjay Shyam Umredkar … Appellant/s V/s. A.O., Canara Bank …Respondent/s
-: Order dated : 07/04/2022 :-
There is no representation for the Appellant. Sufficient time was granted from June 2019 onwards to serve notice on the Respondent, but no steps have been taken so far despite several adjournments. Hence, Appeal is dismissed for default. All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Chairperson
dpj/mks-13
1
Sanjay Shyam Umredkar
A.O., Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
