This single-paragraph order in a miscellaneous appeal adjourned the matter to allow time for filing a reply and consideration of an OTS proposal offered by the respondent bank. The interim order remains in force until 06.09.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 74/2022
Between
Piramal Capital And Housing Finance Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. SiddharthBansilalJaju&Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Sanjay Anabhavane, Advocate for Appellant. MsSonali Jain, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 15/07/2022:-
The Respondent has appeared and vakalatnama filed. He seeks time to file a reply.
It is also submitted by the Ld. Counsel appearing for the parties across the bar that the OTS proposal has been offered by the Respondent Bank which is under consideration with the official of the Respondent Bank. Hence, post the matter on 06.09.2022.
Interim Order shall continue till then.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-24
1
Piramal Capital And Housing Finance Ltd.
Siddharth Bansilal Jaju & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
