Appellant sought time to make pre-deposit for revival of the abandoned appeal. The reference prospective extension on condition of resultant proof getting deposited and conclusion of being taken up on application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.65/2022 Arising out of S.A. No.93/2015 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Dr. Yashwant Singh Vs. Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt Ltd. & Ors
13.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Prakhar Mittal proxy for Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Ms. Jayashree Shukla Dasgupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 65/2022
Proxy counsel for appellant seeks time for making the pre-deposit.
Heard. Let the file be consigned to record and be taken up on an application moved by the appellant for revival of the appeal, after making requisite pre-deposit.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Dr. Yashwant Singh
Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
