Mr.P.S.Palani v. Indian Bank & 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Representation that auction purchaser presence is unnecessary; no steps for impleadment required; matter posted with a connected appeal for arguments.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
M.A:647/2010
Mr.P.S.Palani V/S Indian Bank & 3 Ors
20/12/2022
It is represented that presence of auction purchaser is not necessary. Therefore, there is no need for taking any steps for impleading auction purchaser.
At request of Ld. Counsels for both sides, post the matter on 9.2.2023 along with connected Appeal RA (SA) 36/2016 for arguments.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr.P.S.Palani
- respondent
Indian Bank & 3 Ors
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court