The Mumbai Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal refused an adjournment request by the appellant, noting a High Court direction to dispose of the matter expeditiously, and posted the matter for hearing on 10.06.2022.
No adjournment granted; matter posted for hearing on 10.06.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 54/2011
Between
M/s Manohar Automobiles & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. IDBI Bank Ltd. …Respondent/s
Mr. Meghnath Navlani, Advocate for Appellants
-: Order dated : 22/04/2022 :-
Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants seeks adjournment stating that the arguing counsel (Mr. G. R. Kinkhabwala) is engaged elsewhere.
There is no representation for Respondent Bank.
Since there is direction by the Hon’ble High Court to dispose of the matter expeditiously, hence there shall be no further adjournment.
Parties shall get ready for hearing on the next date, positively. Post on 10.06.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-23
1
M/s Manohar Automobiles & Ors.
IDBI Bank Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
